FORUM

What are your views of the removal of a nude picture of Brook shields taken when she was 12 by the Metropolitan police under new laws created in 2007

By Chris Summerfield

Extremelie 'ippocriticsaesoizoical this exaampel af the thoinkin'in the warld today.
These people tha''arass with their prohibitions ur reawllie sick.
Whoi? Fer they will ne'er nae be sotisfoid until they 'ave gained tottol control over the warld ay the puiple.

Sae these 'ippocritterz can't get enoogh af thaur 'arassments in which they indulge sae fer their sense af power which gie's them their kickz.
Sae they aaways will cum sayin'ter us: Nae smokiesmokierobbinsin, nae this, nae tha'....take yer feckzins, pay us aaw ye got fer the toxins we feed ye, gie'us yer children sae we can maim ay kill them, etc, etc....

But when it cums abit puttin'greedie evil wooliestreetbonkerz behoind bawrs whaur they belang in the foirst place?... nae sairrr, sae they'll teel us, nae sair, we ken naething af sich, on the contraarrie we wanna gie'them a medawl fer renderin' guid services ter the warld...

Sae, sae, such 'ave becum the wayz af the warld af nowadayz: bad 'as becum guid, evil is seen as a virtue, ay 'ippocriticosaesassieness is considered as an extremelie guid virtue worthy affa a croown made af green reptoylescalez.

Sae is the experience af these scalieskinz.
Sae they ur fullie ter the brim, just wot they ur, a bunchaf totallie sick malevolent tail carryin'nitwitz.

Can we expect frae these subcritterz oanie awareness affa justice?
Cud we expect frae them oanie insoight intae the relevance af just bein'sincere ay innocent?
Nae, cirtinlie nae, as these critterz ken naething such, ay ne'er will they.

The dirtieness in their moindz themseefs, whoile tae arrogant ter recognoize this fer themseefs, they will never be prepared ter confront the evils tha'lives roit thaur within themseefs.

Who dae these soolmalingererz thoink they ur ter cum impose ter us their warld vieuws? Ye cannae blame them fer troyin' ter get their kickz, but it's the people who must decoide ter kick them frae this planet fer guid ay e'er.

By owhereman

My view on this is that the right decision has been taken. At the age of 12 years old the young girl was exploited. Anyone who has seen the picture of a barely pubescent girl oiled up and photographed to appear enticing would surely realize that she did not know what she was doing, but that the people around her did.
To allow them to continue to profit from this would be the act of a pimp.

You are way off the mark O'Hare with your usual rant, I'm sorry to say.

Breeze.

By Breeze

o yeah, Breezie, weeel, oi'd say: hud she nae a manawger ter take care af her interests, nae? Case clowsed, sairrr!

Secondlie: The phuttopic was in existenz lang befuir this.
Has oaniewannabuddie made a commeent, oi did nae 'ear oany breeze blowin' then, nae.

Thirdlie: Besoides, oi alse 'ave seen the phuttopic, naethin'evil as far as oi cud detect cursowrilie, just an oilie goirl, just tha' ay naething mair.

Me concluwsion: aaw tha'foightin'ay prohibitin'ur just another feckin'low ruwsez ter divert the attention frae the real eviwlz.

Sae, me point is: wot's the point in nae bin able ter be seein'oilie little giwrls when the warld is in such great turmoil?'ave we reawllie naething better ter dae, oi aask af ye?

If ye can acceept the warld in great turmoil, then ye vewrry weeel can accept oiliegoirlz too, in the end ur they nae part affa a warld in turmoil, nae? Fer instance just boy avoidin' the beaches in summer, ay sae ne'er nae ye will observe oanie oilie giwrlz af oanie age categowrrie, excipt fer in the guid aulde studdio, nae?

Weel, weel, ur ye, Breezie, nae over yer own limit when yer faa'in' ay goin'sae gullibilie in the trap affa socaaed faawseflag maneuverz.

Oi'd say: pockz ter oanie wannabuddie who fail ter see ur is nae capabale ter place pruiper priorititties in the relevance af thoingz.

Bringz me sidewayz ter this queerrie in generawl: how cum it is whoi aaw the puiple tha'advert the guid blessings affa takin' feczins, themseef stifflie refuwse ter take these themseefs?

Oi teel ye: becauwze they daamwell ken tha'feckzinations make little oilie giwrlz doy loike pinkfloys, ye ken.

Fer instance: O'Mama recentlie said: "Nae oi'll just wait me turn fer feczination, fer oi ay me guid famiwlie ur nae in the risky group..."

Oi Say: Nae in riwsk group, sairrrr! Weeel, 'ave oi e'er! Wot then will 'appen if ye'll get a bootaf porkiefluf whoile in the midst affa a nuclear war, me guid buddie!

By owhereman

I'm afraid your conspiracy mania and trying to relate everything to a bigger picture is , I repeat, way off the mark. Focus on the question and answer it.
Don't bluster your way to the fat end of the wedge all the time,it's not particularly intelligent. If you are searching for values,ask yourself whether you would have acted in such a way with your own daughter...I hope the answer won't be too disgraceful. I believe the girl's mother was her Manager.
Finally, I am not tearing a strip off you personally, so back off or I'll rip your nuts off, though you reply with so many words like a man coming put of the desert deprived of, then finding, some water.

Breeze

By Breeze

Conspiracy mania? Ken naething wot ye spik af.
Sae, sae Breezie, these conspiracie mania is wot lives in yer moind itseef. Paranoianaloizin'me in tha'koinda bigger picture?
Sae oi can repeat tae: Breezie yer way off the mark.

Questions aawreddie 'ave bin aaaw aanswered fullie ter the brim.
Next: intelligent? Must oi, must oi reawllie?
Who sirches fer values in'ere!

Breezie, cut the crap with "own daughter..."
Breezie, as oi ken Brookie since tha'toime, she woz prettie weel a little apt ladie who very weel ken wot she wanted ay cud pirfictlie act ter be her own manager too.
Ay noo as she 'ave becum the roife wimin affa age, oi ne'er nae did 'ear 'er e'er cumplainin'abit oanie af her phuttopickerie tha'woz taken when she woz younger, on the contraarie, nae?

Breezie, noow listen! Ye yerseef wroites: "I hope the answer won't be too disgraceful. I believe the girl's mother was her Manager."
Weeel, is this nae the pirfict answer fer the queerrie tha'ye posed wan moment earlier with: "wottif it it's yer own daughter, grummmpfff."
Breezie, oi seriooslie wunder whether ye 'ave nae taken suime cervicaalfeczination boy oanie chance. Whoi? Fer oi fear tha' Olliezeimer has beset ye quoite very earwlie, nae.

Breezy, is this supposed ter serve assa threat, sairr? When ye spik af: "oi'll be tearing a strip of porkieflesh off you personally ay alsae affa yer back a whole lot off, ay will rip your nuts off too..."
Weeel Breezie, as ye sim ter be manlie enoof ter spik affa values ay courtesies, ay sinceritittie, ay uproiteness, etc, oi thrust ye ter visit me ay speedily implement oanie as ye wish.
But when spikkin' af intelligence, ye main wunder hoow then a "fat end of the wedge" cud exist if it has naething ter adhere ter? Ye cum teel me noo!

By owhereman

Yes, you are pontificating, arrogant and rather despicable in this matter.
Persona non grata.

By Breeze

Chuwckleyik, loike it when ye git breezin'ay usin'wuirds affa true mocknificenz!

PS: Wotch the nowstrilz buddie, ye ken, ye shud be askin'a a guid fee fer aaw tha' available parkin'space.

By owhereman

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yjYi5e1HNf0

By owhereman

let her decide

By arthead

the exploitation of youth. by whom? absurd to treat ADs like crimes when so many serious crimes concerning children...ignored? a career move by a self-involved 12 year-old? just another sleazy celeb advert? fergive th' hypocrisy by another hypocritical endeavor! strains at the incredulity which ought be forseen/forsworn. INOTHERWORDS the only criminal act committed was/is hypocrisy; compounded by zealous solemn nitwits!

esulWillIgnoreTheObviousOblivitumEsse

By esulW

There are still too many retarded nincompoops talking as you speak.

By Capt. Salad Egg

Aren't we the big men pushin' our way around. The serious criminals who do exploit children would see this picture as a gloss for their activities. Wake up.

Breeze

By Breeze

Any half witted or mildly informed idiot who was roaming the backwater when the Shields first broke onto the scene knows that subliminal enticement and sexual provocation were the keystones to her rise to fame. Of course one can’t blame the twelve year old who was asked to pose. What does a twelve year old know about the nature of erotica, perversion, manipulation, and flowering bank accounts? The problem here is one that goes much deeper, one that goes beyond the ego clamoring of the pretentious shouts and screams for artistic liberty, one that evinces the pinched nosed cries of aesthetics for aesthetics sake and speaks to the core of reason, the kind of reason which comprehends the nature of the sacred because it is a part of that essence and not separate from it. Given our awareness via the various Medias of the distress so many children and families have been subjected to because of such issues the scandal here is nothing more than a suppository for the insipid. All of this is déjà vu over and over again and one becomes easily bored by the verbally obtuse commentary of those who would have us believe that an anything goes kind of world is the quickest and surest way to some kind of utopian liberation of the spirit. Just as it is true that too much restriction will ultimately lead to revolt and anarchy, too much transcendence will ultimately lead to totalitarianism.

By clepsydra

The "choild" in question is noow € 50,- affa age ay in vewrrie wealthie circumstanzes. She 'erseef assa buzzinesswoman ne'er cumplained abit nuiting, sae whoi shud ye buither?

The havooc ay may'eem lives aaw in yer moinds itseef, buddies. Oi bet suime affa ye cirtinlie wud loike ter abuse a oiliegoirlie ay jist spik ter hoide yer intentions.

Suime affa ye jist wanna demonstratate seefroighteoosness, alas, 35 yeawrs ur mair tae laete, buddie.

Oi dae nae buither abit oanaething abit Brookiepookie, nor abit oanie feckin'picz oaniewair. Oi just commeent when oi smell the 'ippocriticsaesoizieness, may oi pleawz, dae we nae ur sipposed ter loive in demoncrassie?

If ye wanna tok reawl eviwl abuse affa innocent choildren, just gae luik mair befittinglie fer the actual caeses affa abuse affa choildren aaw o'er the warld. Fer instance, the cawses that noowadays play in hoidin' roit before yer vewrrie own woide linkin'parkin'lot nowstrilz, sich as abusin'choildren ter seel worthless foulfeckzins.

Sae ye gae alsae thoink abit whot playz in thoird warld coontries whaur choildren live in extreme circumstanzes affa real hunger ay povewrtie.

Hoow abit choild sixual abuse as in Toilund. Ne'er hurd oanie affa ye popes af pruditittie say oaniething abit tha', ye ken.

Hoow abit choildren in the east bombed ter mincemeat ter test the effectivitittie affa yer beluived fragmentittiebombzes.

Ye cum teel me noow, me buddiez!

By owhereman

You strike me as an avaricious soapbox louse, O'Hare.

By Breeze

Woteva, e'en a miserawble louis still's Gad's critter, ay whot daes it matter, as lang as feel affa relevonce ay prioritittie still ur intact.

Choildren ur abused nowadayz soimplie becauz some rich puiple wanna make them vanish becauze they live in lands tha'ur rich wi'woteva.

http://photosthatchangedtheworld.com/starving-child-vulture/?_wpnonce=30bae5302f&flagged-comment=1&flagged-comment-id=6

http://www.worldpressphoto.org/index.php?option=com_photogallery&task=view&id=184&Itemid=115&bandwidth=high

By owhereman

The point here is not the Shields. She was abused in a very subtle way over three decades ago. It may or may not be water under the bridge for her because she was paid just like the flesh Polanski defiled was paid. And perhaps Shields simply doesn’t want to be bothered because she’s too busy giving speeches at funerals for touchy-feely moonwalkers and collecting residual checks. It’s not a question for Shields to decide. It’s a question for society to decide. And society in a democratic state has said that using children in this way is not what it wants to see. Shields, in this instance has become the iconographic backdrop for the kind of social commentary which is long overdue regarding the abuse of children in any and all respects and from any and all countries and in any and all contexts and circumstances, and one can be sure that her press agents are not going to put out the fire, or do anything to deaden the potential for polemic. Such, unfortunately is the extent of the rabid unwholesomeness in the world we live in, however as far as I’m concerned those who create proactive mock commentary for such exhibitionism are ignorant, express little or no insight, and possess the kind of rigid neared sighted libertarian sentiment that make them ideological fodder for other branches of extremist thinking. Child abuse is wrong. No glossy makeover, tepid deconstruction, or museum manifestation will alter that fact.

Innocence doesn’t demand subsidy.

One spots the back peddling, vulgar, and opportunist monkey rather easily. It throws stones at those who lift their head above the parapet, and then when confronted with its ineptitude and hollow action skips away and hides behind the skirts of sentiment.

By clepsydra

Noice wuirds, but quoite in a blaghblagh manner.

Reawl ignoirance we can nowadayz see e'eriewhaur aroon' whene'er faawse flag maneuverz ur bein'supported, wittin'lie ur nae.

Wud it matter wan camalfig ur -toe, oi thoink nae, as lang as them feckerz ur jist thoink affa themseefs as the greawtest gads, ay be grinnin' abit other's sufferin's. Tha's: till suime day a hammer will stroike themseef roit in their 'eart affa evilnez, be it sibtlie ur nae.

PS: Ay noow ye must stop throwin'stones at oaniethoing tha'lifts itseef abuive the feckin'parachuttapet, y'ear!

Oi predict ye yerseef main foind yerseef vewrrie abba-used tae, when ye'll end up debulked frae loads affa laard, me switman!

By owhereman

Huuum...still feelin' loike ter apolollologoize.
Pir'aaps thaur's nae need ter resoide in bitterness?

Fer gratitittietudilittilielassielie, amidst the crudest affa blaghblagh, still cud be foond this spranklin'jewel affa the Noyle, wan tha'wud nae be sae bad fer display in Wooliestreet:

"Innocence needs nae subsmoroinepuffdiddie !"
(= Innocence needs no subsidy" (!) (sic)

Wud tha'nae sewrve assa the O'Mama affa aaw the mothaz affa langlaufin'stocks tha'sims ter characteroize this centuwrrie sae, oy, oy!

By owhereman

The problem with some people is that they never step back away from the framework long enough to see what they’re really doing and therefore continue to perpetuate their own bullshit and dimwittedness until it has finally bored the knickers off of everyone and left nothing but sterility and repetition to contemplate. These childish people personify a type of bloat. They are fat headed, arrogant, and more often than not lazy individuals who see themselves as somehow exempt from criticism because of the mouthy contempt they purport against all and everything which doesn’t suit their picture of what a perfect world should be. The conclusions they tend to draw are thick with the gluey substance of an over stuffed opinion of themselves and when they are taken to task a form of blabbering juvenile provocation via missives of unintelligible content becomes their last resort.

By clepsydra

Suime puiple, blagh baw baw!....who puiple, barf barf! Whot then follows nixt main serve assa quoite a hatefil description affa yer pirsinal seef.

Whoi is yer breezin'retort sae filled ter the brim wi'this koinda self-hate, buddie? Pir'aaps ye shud 'ave bin breastfed instead affa 'ave bin servin'as a spangebab fer the cleanin'affa the inner lavatorriez. This is as far tha' can be detected frae the gump tha'ye presentlie sae 'ippocriticsaesassilie ur spikkin', buddie.

It's quoite obvioos tha' ye dae ken whot has bin said, ur else ye ne'er nae wud be sae reactin' in this koinda spoitefil mood tha' cirtinlie is nae inducoive ter oanie form affa cumprehenzion.

Oi cud offer ye a full Sassaetranszlasian, but tha'shirley wud 'ave cut yer 'eart in pieces roit oan the sput, ay it's doobtful whether ye ur 'cirtin puiple' wud be appricoziatittietive af such.

By owhereman

Some people take everything personally, even comments which are non nominative and general in nature. Why do such people retort to such generalities? Do they feel a deep rooted guilt? Are they haunted by feelings of inferiority? What does the masque they hide behind with their boisterous and bygone babbling tell us about them?

The troubled personality continues to lash out like the ignominious and crippled funambulist who can no longer judge the tautness of the rope or the distance to the ground; it sees reason as the aggressor and it shrinks from intuition like the withered and impoverished soul sadly condemned to knock forever at the door of freedom with its clink and its clank.

By clepsydra

O'Hare is hooked up onto the Butcher's hook and he's beginning to enjoy the lashing.
Clepsydra, we know he's a sad lonely loser, but there is also a responsibility of care to a vulnerable one.

By Breeze

Hummm...nae oanie big use in pursuein'this fitilitittie oanie further.

Clearly haur's mairlie a sombewr caese affa deep feelin's affa depirsinalization.

Probababaubalie this main be wannaf the doire consequencez frae jelliebrain-roastin' electroshowck ur at leawst a lobbytommie.

Listen haur spangemukker, wotever ill fortuine main 'ave 'appened ter ye, oi urge ye ter immidjitelie stop yer throwin'stones at me guid mikker Basiwl above the parakeetapet, y'ear me, dammit!

PS: Breeze, ay waddaboot if it's yer oown dofter, ay wot if she has oanlie a vultuire fer her pet? Buddie, ye cum teel me noow, maister hook-it-but-it-ainnae-X-mas yit!

By owhereman

Some people are incapable of understanding the true nature of silence, the kind of silence which permits reflection, the kind of reflection that allows one to awaken to the vital whole within. Some people have minds that are full of chatter and their cluttered souls dream dreams of retribution. These are not people of the heart because they do not know how to be still and by that stillness move the greater spirits. Such people are saturated by the angry mind and their fear of being forgotten drives them blindly forward into the corridors of incoherent thought where their only occupation is time. We call these discordant egos of gratis dictum "the space fillers."

By clepsydra

Suime puiple shud soimplie whoine less abit other puiple's splinters in the yek, ay taeke a hard luik intae themseefz whaur aftentoimes the thickest affa thick beams resoides insoide themseefs, ay just acceept tha'everiewannabuddie is unox sae as ter kip their pish.

By owhereman

You might be different but by God you're dull.

By Breeze

Oaah cummon!

If ye wanna reid suimething REAWLLIE DULL, faasten yer toiletseatbeltz, pleaze.
Ladies ay djintlemen, 'ere cums the stuff tha' trullie defoines the term "borin'":

"Ελ,

O... listen... can you hear nothing? Can you hear that last lost ninth note called soilent greeen... sometimes no movement is the best movement of all, especiallie if ye wud wanna relaax...

The Search for Love
As I was dancing (or what I thought mist go fer it) oi siddenlie became aware that O'Hare was being unfaithful to me. What could I do but continue my elegant movements till he made me trip oan the floor...

Oh my Owhaur Orpheus;
Your songs charm wild beasts
And coax the rocks ter splinter
And move the trees ter faa dooown
Me sool in Hades holds a dukkie
Tha''as becum virtually a ghost frae noow
My body is yOuRs, Owhaur...Owhaur....!

I await your…kisS
In a cuppa soup,
a cry withit teawrs…..
stalv …asses this dammit forrum

With the evening Breeze
Please …speed ter me, me…O'Hare Love
a favour from Zeus ye ur
tha' oi 'ae asked ter donate ter me
Till then oi wanna keep you safe
But a box oi feel is nae wot ye waant...

"Can I be indiscreet"? Breeze asked.
"What are you suggesting Jezus, me belle"?
"How do you earn your money, Breeze"?
"I'm an arms dealer, but lost aaw me earned assetz in Landsbonki"....

Etc, etc, continued in thread "Souvenir".

Noicelie troid, Breezie. The jokes oi cud appricotiziate, but oi didnae faa fer yer poem affa love. Sowwrie ter disappooint ye. Maybe this is whoi ye 'ate me sae.
Ah weeel, such is loife, oi gueess.

By owhereman

Some people are born without grace. Their movements are stiff and lack fluidity. These people speak with overcast expressions. They are gloomy, and smell of mildewed grey. Some people are pantomime revolutionaries. They screech, holler, insult the passerby, and brandish books, but when truth knocks they turn their heads, close their eyes, clench their fists, and slam their doors.

Mediocrity is a condition wed for the sake of convenience. It is personified by gob mouthed individuals who yackety yak muddle headed phrases and whine about position. Mediocrity often leads to unchecked productivity and a cesspool mentality which is easily discernable due to its persistent irrelevance and conspicuous fascination with the fecal. In this respect mediocrity at time resembles an animal rolling around in its own shit while it howls at the moon.

By clepsydra

Join this debate

See other debates

Start a new debate